Postsymbolic Communication

April 8th, 2008

cuttle_fish.jpg

I have been thinking a lot about visual representation and how different people often choose to represent the same experience in strikingly different ways. Choosing which details to retain and which to remove in order to communicate with more emotion or clarity. If the same object or experience can be represented in a multitude of ways, could it be possible to design an interface that allows us to slide gradually between these multiple representations and examine the subtle ways in which the message is changed?

How many times have I heard someone say “I can see it in my head but I can’t get it down on paper”? Would an elastic representation that required manipulation of variables in place of manipulation of paint, graphite or pixels give these people the tools for expression they desire? Or would it be doomed to the same fate as the early Photoshop filters which rapidly became meaningless because of the ease of use and abuse they afforded? I am not sure.

Over the weekend Elaine and I went out to a great restaurant in China Town with a gentlemen we met at the Massaging Media Conference. During the car ride to the restaurant he mentioned that he heard Jaron Lanier give a speech on cuttle fish several years back at the new england aquarium. I stumbled upon a written version of same lecture a few weeks ago in a book about science and optimism and found it to be fascinating and somehow related to my own ideas about elastic representation.

I did not buy the book, but found an extended version of the essay online. Here is an excerpt from a section that I found to be particularly interesting:

Our software tools are not yet flexible enough to enable us, in virtual reality, to think ourselves into different forms. Why would we want to? Consider the existing benefits of our ability to create sounds with our mouths. We can make new noises and mimic existing ones, spontaneously and instantaneously. But when it comes to visual communication, we are hamstrung. We can mime, and indeed when I give lectures on cephalopods I like to pretend to be the crab and the cuttlefish to illustrate the tale. (More than one student has pointed out that with my hair as it is, I am looking more and more like a cephalopod.) We can learn to draw and paint, or use computer-graphics design software. But we cannot generate images at the speed with which we can imagine them.

You can find the rest of the article here, and Jaron’s web site here.

2 Responses to “Postsymbolic Communication”

  1. Elaine Says:

    Jason, is that a cuttlefish? I almost put some cuttlefish in my ink paper because it used to be one of the best ink bases in the ancient world. funny how the same things keep coming back.

  2. Scott Says:

    I love this:

    “If the same object or experience can be represented in a multitude of ways, could it be possible to design an interface that allows us to slide gradually between these multiple representations and examine the subtle ways in which the message is changed?”

    A great question, and of course it would make any visualization much more complex. But yet, what if your data (your “object or experience”) could be visualized in several different ways *and* each visualization could be arrived at via a gradual transition from any other. So representation B could be accessed from A, and during the move from A to B, we could observe what’s changing, and therefore the shift in priorities about what to represent and what not to.

    Maybe I just rephrased what you already said above. I guess my point is that these are some great ideas that have got me thinking.

Leave a Reply

best free hidden object games